I've been thinking a lot recently about the destruction of communities by the overuse of the automobile. To be honest I think that walkers are most in tune with their surroundings than any other mode of transport. Even cycling, whilst being much more environmentally friendly than the car (or even public transport possibly?), leads to people being eager to get from A to B without quite engaging with the people around. I draw the readers' attention to the fact that when I cycle I very rarely get asked if I can ‘spare some change’, whereas if I walk I will quite often be stopped and asked something.
What I'm trying to illustrate here is the fact that our communities have swung into a very non-communicative mode. It is a shame that when I walk that the majority of social interactions are of the less pleasant variety. Even though mobile phones and the Internet have enabled us a mechanism of creating what are now called “virtual communities”. There still is no substitute for a genuine face to face dialogue occasionally. I suspect that if more people walked there would be an increased number of people who knew each other passing the time of day. This would hopefully lead to a better balance of interaction between people in the communities in which we actually exist. Hopefully morale would be higher as peoples' impressions would not be that the place was just being overrun by scavvers!
Of course this is only true up to a point. Since taking up walking as a serious hobby, over ten years ago, I've noticed walker numbers increasing across the land. The interesting effect of this seems to have been that people are getting less friendly. In locations where walkers were rare it would be very poor form to pass someone without saying ‘hello’. With increased saturation of numbers walkers seem to actively try to ignore the presence of another person. The iPod generation walks blithely past without eye contact - presumably because they've come away from a big city and are sick to death with other people. I refer you back to previous comments about over-population in this nation of ours.
So, having strayed somewhat from the point I've reproduced here a very interesting sign from Cambridge. It says ‘cyclists have priority’, this is a good message, but drivers should not need reminding of this. It clearly states in the Highway Code that pedestrians have priority across side entrances. On this street, the exit from yet another development of flats, the cyclists are also in the road, so normal priorities should also be obvious. I wonder if this is yet another indication of the Nanny State? Will we have to have massive posters at every road feature listing the rules of conduct that are expected at that point? If so then it follows that these posters should also be translated into other languages, or even announced by some device so that people who cannot read can be made aware.
I'm overselling my point, but it is an interesting sign of the times don't you think?
